EcoRenovator  

Go Back   EcoRenovator > Improvements > Geothermal & Heat Pumps
Advanced Search
 


Blog 60+ Home Energy Saving Tips Recent Posts


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-14, 02:44 AM   #241
ICanHas
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: US
Posts: 150
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Efficiency, toxicity, explosiveness, cost and flammability must all be considered. On the extreme ends of flammability hazard is hydrocarbons while toxicity would be ammonia and SO2.

As awesome as it would be, we don't have the almighty fluid.

HFO-1234yf and HFC-32 are in consideration, however they're not perfect as they have A2L flammability classification even though they're not as dangerous as hydrocarbons. They require much higher concentration, higher ignition energy to ignite and do not propagate explosively like gaseous hydrocarbons.

I don't believe there's a silver bullet. The use of existing stock and reclaimed HCFC-22 remains legal for service.

There are plethora of approved replacements, but I'm not sure which one we should settle down on yet. I don't believe there's been extensive testing done using tailored equipment.

New equipment have migrated to R-410A. R-32 could possibly substitute it.

Any blend and new refrigerants are subject to patent dictated pricing including the R441A/HCR188C .

ICanHas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-14, 10:58 AM   #242
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 724 Times in 534 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NiHaoMike View Post
What do you propose given that R22 is being phased out? What alternative do you suggest that can match R290 (and other hydrocarbons) for efficiency?
Mike, why are you wasting your time in this troll?

The game is very clear.
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker...
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-14, 12:36 PM   #243
buffalobillpatrick
Master EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florissant, Colorado
Posts: 599
Thanks: 814
Thanked 59 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Just found info R290 vs. R22:

R290 (Propane) has about 35% less liquid viscosity than R22 (1 / 1.5555)

Due to Molecular Mass of R22 (86.5) is almost double that of R290 (44.1)

Refrigerants - Physical Properties

So it seems that R22 fixed oriface expansion devices will flow about 35% more R290

Also: Liquid R290 has about 20% better thermal conductivity than R22
buffalobillpatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-14, 12:40 PM   #244
NiHaoMike
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
NiHaoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 14
Thanked 257 Times in 241 Posts
Default

It doesn't quite work that way. R290 will work just fine in a R22 system.
__________________
To my surprise, shortly after Naomi Wu gave me a bit of fame for making good use of solar power, Allie Moore got really jealous of her...
NiHaoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NiHaoMike For This Useful Post:
buffalobillpatrick (11-12-14)
Old 11-12-14, 12:44 PM   #245
buffalobillpatrick
Master EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florissant, Colorado
Posts: 599
Thanks: 814
Thanked 59 Times in 55 Posts
Default

http://mail.airah.org.au/downloads/2004-05-01.pdf

3 - Conclusions
The refrigerating capacity of a R22 compressor that was switched to propane was
reduced between 13% to 20%. These values, though more or less as expected
from refrigerant properties, are somewhat affected by differences in volumetric
efficiency that, at intermediate pressure ratios are lower for propane. On the other
hand, unlike expected by the analysis of isentropic cycles, there is an increase
in COP of the compressor of 1% to 3%. In the case of the scroll compressor
differences in capacity are shorter (up to 15%) and even reversed and COP values
are around 1% to 2% higher with propane. A noticeable result is in the volumetric
efficiency of both refrigerants, showing considerable differences.
In the origin of the observed behaviour, three main factors can be thought to
have an influence: the reduced irreversible heat flow due to the lower discharge
temperatures of propane, the increased electric efficiency of the system working
against a reduced load and the reduced pump losses in the inlet and discharge
valves
buffalobillpatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-14, 12:52 PM   #246
buffalobillpatrick
Master EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florissant, Colorado
Posts: 599
Thanks: 814
Thanked 59 Times in 55 Posts
Default

My comment :
" So it seems that R22 fixed oriface expansion devices will flow about 35% more R290"

possibly holds true at the same pressures, but R290 generally operates at lower pressure,
which may make the liquid flows more even. ?

@50C R22 is about 38PSI higher than R290

Last edited by buffalobillpatrick; 11-12-14 at 12:54 PM..
buffalobillpatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-14, 01:54 PM   #247
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 724 Times in 534 Posts
Default

BBP,

Good analysis w/ good technical explanation.

I've done more than a few searches for studies of efficiency differences (COP) between R-22 & R-290, and R-290 comes out ahead in every study I've found.

Hacking a R-22 system straight across to R-290 works fine. The metering device may not be optimum, if you are using cap tubes. If you have an adjustable orifice device, like an adjustable TXV, you should be able to dial it right in.

Your study implies quite a few parameters that are different.

There are some free HX sizing programs in the Internet that will take into account the multi-variant factors, and you can dial right in the optimum components you need.

As I recall, THIS_ONE did a pretty good job.

-AC
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker...
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AC_Hacker For This Useful Post:
buffalobillpatrick (11-12-14)
Old 11-12-14, 02:21 PM   #248
buffalobillpatrick
Master EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florissant, Colorado
Posts: 599
Thanks: 814
Thanked 59 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Yes, I like the GEA Flat Plate HX online sizing software. I have used it several times over the last 5 yrs.

I have already bought 2X of the 4-Ton coax (snake) HX's from Surplus City.
Oversized for my 2-Ton R410a Copland scroll compressor.

As I will be using Propane, in my DIY W/W heat pump, I am trying to figure out how the oversized Condenser & Evaporator will effect Subcool & Superheat?

I have a 2-Ton R22 TXV with 0-50*F Superheat adjustment.

Am trying to figure out if SLHX, IHX will help COP or not?

Most of the many website I have researched say SLHX will help some, as Propane
needs very high Superheat at Compressor inlet using POE oil (33-35*C or K, note: as this is a delta temp, C or K are interchangeable)

and more Subcool should also help as fewer bubbles will be present at TXV.
Also lower temp. refrigerant entering Evaporator will pick-up heat faster.

Last edited by buffalobillpatrick; 11-12-14 at 02:36 PM..
buffalobillpatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-14, 06:34 PM   #249
jeff5may
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: elizabethtown, ky, USA
Posts: 2,431
Thanks: 431
Thanked 619 Times in 517 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to jeff5may
Default

When I was going through the same process, I made a decision to go with thick mineral oil. The pag and ester oils just don't play with r290 as well as the old stuff. Also, the stink oil in camp gas bottles is mineral oil based as well. I figured that the oil thinning issue and the superheat conundrum would both be solved at once. The system has been doing well since I got rid of a few design bugs.
jeff5may is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jeff5may For This Useful Post:
buffalobillpatrick (11-12-14)
Old 11-12-14, 07:10 PM   #250
jeff5may
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: elizabethtown, ky, USA
Posts: 2,431
Thanks: 431
Thanked 619 Times in 517 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to jeff5may
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buffalobillpatrick View Post
Yes, I like the GEA Flat Plate HX online sizing software. I have used it several times over the last 5 yrs.

I have already bought 2X of the 4-Ton coax (snake) HX's from Surplus City.
Oversized for my 2-Ton R410a Copland scroll compressor.

As I will be using Propane, in my DIY W/W heat pump, I am trying to figure out how the oversized Condenser & Evaporator will effect Subcool & Superheat?

I have a 2-Ton R22 TXV with 0-50*F Superheat adjustment.

Am trying to figure out if SLHX, IHX will help COP or not?

Most of the many website I have researched say SLHX will help some, as Propane
needs very high Superheat at Compressor inlet using POE oil (33-35*C or K, note: as this is a delta temp, C or K are interchangeable)

and more Subcool should also help as fewer bubbles will be present at TXV.
Also lower temp. refrigerant entering Evaporator will pick-up heat faster.
With oversized heat exchangers, your approach temperature on both sides should be very close. I believe both randen and mejunkhound both had pretty much nil superheat coming out of their evaporator heat exchangers and the system efficiency was a stellar figure. With a water source, the saturation temperature of the evaporator can be much closer to the actual loop or feed source water temperature due to the large surface area and high heat transfer capacity. This is a case not studied well by the institution, due to the obvious extra expenses of the gross oversizing. The compressor is the limiting factor here, it will be very happy with a low compression ratio to overcome, and your power draw will reflect the situation.

jeff5may is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jeff5may For This Useful Post:
buffalobillpatrick (11-12-14)
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design