12-23-13, 10:44 AM | #1 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 147
Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
|
minimum solar thermal collector slope
Apologies if the answer is prominently posted in bold somewhere but I've searched to no avail so have to ask. What is considered the minimum slope to avoid stagnation? Are there ways to overcome stagnation if the minimum slope can't be achieved? Perhaps a lower set point on the collector inlet temp signal in combination with a tempering valve to bypass the thermal storage tank until operating temps are reached – thinking out load a this point.
A recently started renovation gives me the opportunity to plumb for a future collector if it's feasible. Thanks everyone. |
12-23-13, 11:06 AM | #2 |
Steve Hull
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: hilly, tree covered Arcadia, OK USA
Posts: 826
Thanks: 241
Thanked 165 Times in 123 Posts
|
First, I think we are talking about a solar hot water collector. Secondly, I believe you are talking about a thermo siphon system where the storage tank is located above the collector.
I think you are asking about the slope of the collector with a vertical collector allowing the best thermo siphon operation. You are correct that a flat collector, with a passive hot water collector plate does exhibit water flow stagnation. Can you offer some additional details so we can understand better? Steve
__________________
consulting on geothermal heating/cooling & rational energy use since 1990 |
12-23-13, 11:21 AM | #3 |
Master EcoRenovator
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 958
Thanks: 40
Thanked 158 Times in 150 Posts
|
Avoiding stagnation can be done a few ways. First, is to angle the panels at 80-90 deg, next is to have panels with low terminal temps anyway. For example, most German panels (Viessmann for example) have highly selective absorbers such as "sunselect" or "bluetec". These panels can get up to 200C+ if left in full sun.
Thermo-Dynamics from N.S. has two different panels (as does Viessmann) with the highly selective surface or a painted surface. The difference in stagnation temps could be as much as 40C. The other thing to think about is the insulation. The better the enclosure the higher the stagnation temp. Many people will decide to have a moderately insulated (lesser cost) case and more panel area to get more total heat out. Most good controllers will limit the pump operation to collector temps below 130C as the pump is typically not approved for temps above that. After that, the collector will steam the antifreeze out of the panel which will then go into the expansion tank. If the panel temp can be limited to below 100C by angle and a large or multiple tanks, stagnation will be kept to a minimum. Good glycols, made for solar, are designed to take the high temps but standard glycols are not. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mikesolar For This Useful Post: | sunspot (12-23-13) |
12-23-13, 05:01 PM | #4 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 147
Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
|
Thanks for the input so far. I see I was waaay short on detail.
I'd like to go with a drainback (similar to the BuilditSolar $1K) system with the water level in the tank ~ 12" below the bottom of the collector and roughly 40 ft away. This will be water only, no glycol. The thermal storage tank will be ~ 500 gallons. There will be other heat input to the tank the collector in question just an opportunistic addition if it's possible. The collector would be homebuilt of copper pipe/aluminum absorbers. |
12-23-13, 05:34 PM | #5 |
Lurking Renovator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 21
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
You don't really have to worry about stagnation with a drainback system. Fluid will not be in the collectors when the system is not on. Slope in a drainback is to ensure water can easily flow back to the tank so it is not left in the collectors to freeze.
I had a very similar situation with a long pipe run and antagonized on what slope I could get away with. It is commonly recommended to have a minimum of 1/4" drop per foot of run for drain back systems. At 40' , you'd only require 10" of drop to adhere to that. There are a few sources that indicate you can get away with less. Dr. Ben suggests a slope of 1" over 20' Solar Water Heater Design (9 minutes into video 1.1). This source even mentions completely level collector installations: Plumbing Engineer - Features: March 2011: Drainback Solar Hot Water Collection Innovations (see last paragraph). I would be careful with that though as construction tolerances could put you on the wrong side of level. |
12-23-13, 05:50 PM | #6 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 147
Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
|
Should also have mentioned it's the angle of the collector itself I'm concerned about. Optimum is generally latitude plus 10 or 15 degrees to bias performance to the lower winter sun angle but in this case I'd be closer to 20 degrees above flat. If it would work summer DHW preheat would be taken care of.
|
12-23-13, 07:23 PM | #7 |
Lurking Renovator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 21
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
Properly constructed panels of copper and aluminum should be fine with any tilt.
Selecting a tilt is more a matter of optimization of annual vs winter collection of energy. See graph 2 here: Optimizing Thermal Collector Tilt Angles | SolarPro Magazine for a general idea of the effect of collector tilt on annual production. Panels at 20 degrees will experience more direct sunlight in the summer. Panels at 45 degrees will still experience direct sunshine, just later/earlier in the year. |
The Following User Says Thank You to ESharp For This Useful Post: | sunspot (12-23-13) |
01-07-14, 09:00 PM | #8 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 147
Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
01-08-14, 08:57 AM | #9 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
|
Nice progress. Are you planning on just one panel? What other means of heating the tank will you be using? Any more details on the project? It sounds interesting.
__________________
Current project - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. & To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
01-08-14, 09:29 AM | #10 | |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 147
Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sunspot For This Useful Post: | Daox (01-08-14) |
|
|