EcoRenovator  

Go Back   EcoRenovator > Off Topic > The Billiards Room
Advanced Search
 


Blog 60+ Home Energy Saving Tips Recent Posts


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-26-10, 11:44 PM   #11
Xringer
Lex Parsimoniae
 
Xringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Woburn, MA
Posts: 4,918
Thanks: 114
Thanked 250 Times in 230 Posts
Default

Freedom from using (so much) oil is a worthy goal..

The world needs to cut back on the amount used. It's going to run out sooner are later.

It would be nice if we re-discovered how to make safe thorium reactors
to take care of our power requirements for the next few hundred years.

That would allow us to use oil for more important things that don't involve just burning it up..
If we stopped burning it as a fuel, and just used it for making plastics etc, it could last another 200+ years..

Xringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-10, 10:37 PM   #12
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default

Is Freedom from Foreign Oil a Worthy Goal?

Quote:
  • U.S. oil production peaked in the early 1970's and has been declining since, despite advances in production technology;
  • In 1970 we imported 28% of the transportation fuels we consumed. Today we import over 65% (Energy Information Administration);

    -energyliteracy.org
It's frequently quoted that as a nation, we're importing 65% of our oil.

Interesting when we hear that figure, the assumption is that we're equally involved... but we are not.

People with more affluent lifestyles are more intense consumers of resources.

So if we were to cut 65% of our oil consumption, where would it come from?

The US military is the single largest consumer of petroleum on the planet.

How likely is the Pentagon to volunteer to reduce it consumption by 65%?

Or the big SUVs with their infamously poor mileage, will the people who can afford to buy these monsters willingly adopt a smaller, lighter car that would get 65% better mileage?

Or the over-sized McMansions with their over-sized heating bills. When the average sized house in Cuba is around 600 square feet, and the average size new house in the USA is around 2500 square feet, how likely are people who live in these things to reduce their house heating foot print by 65%?

And air travel and foreign vacations... where will we find the 65% of the people who will just say "no" to jet travel?

And when will the meat-eaters amongst us elect to switch their diets to less energy intense (and more healthful) vegetarian diets.

-AC_Hacker
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-10, 05:59 AM   #13
Sularus65
Lurking Renovator
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 14
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Very valid points ( except I personally can't give up eating meat). As a member of the US military I can attest to consumption of petroleum. Much of it boils down to lack of innovation because of the ease of using petroleum. The space race in the 50s and 60s sparked tons of innovation, but the fervor did not carry over to the automobile industry. We can put men in space running on batteries in the 60s, but we are just now figuring out how to do it for cars over 40 years later. Technology follows and mirrors the mentality of society. It is about convience, not requirements. Take me for example, I am posting this on my blackberry from work.
Sularus65 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sularus65 For This Useful Post:
Xringer (09-28-10)
Old 09-28-10, 09:51 AM   #14
RobertSmalls
Journeyman EcoRenovator
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 344
Thanks: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I'd much rather import oil than have a sub-Cuban standard of living: the Cubans at least have meat in their soup. Perhaps Japan would be a better exemplar? They appear to have avoided McMansions and suburban sprawl altogether, and they are early adopters of efficient automotive technologies.
RobertSmalls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-10, 10:21 AM   #15
Xringer
Lex Parsimoniae
 
Xringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Woburn, MA
Posts: 4,918
Thanks: 114
Thanked 250 Times in 230 Posts
Default BIG houses..

I guess kids have been watching too many TV shows about the rich and famous..

Because it seems there is a big demand for jumbo houses. Around here, when a nice
home gets sold, about half the time, no moving truck rolls up, but a large
dumpster appears overnight. With a large back-hoe to rip down the home.

Later, swarms of workers (many who speak no English) build a super-sized house.
It stays on the market between 1 to 18 months and then two or three people move
into a house with 6 bathrooms and 11 bedrooms..?.

Lately, it seems like these homes (which resemble resorts in many cases)
are being vacated and resold about once every year or two..

In Lexington MA, these houses appeared to be sealed (all windows closed) 24-7-365.
They all seem to have a roll of large heatpumps, (maybe AC only /w oil?) normally
three or more units, which seem to run a lot..
Xringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-10, 10:44 AM   #16
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
I'd much rather import oil than have a sub-Cuban standard of living: the Cubans at least have meat in their soup...
Oil is sold on an international market, to the highest bidder.

Since we citizens have been so complacent and stupid as to keep electing politicians that are gutting our manufacturing sector, our ability to create worth is dropping at the same time as our consumption is increasing.

The result is that our money is becoming less valuable, while imported oil is becoming more valuable.

We are in danger of losing the option of importing any amount of oil that we want, at will.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Xringer View Post
Because it seems there is a big demand for jumbo houses. Around here, when a nice home gets sold, about half the time, no moving truck rolls up, but a large dumpster appears overnight. With a large back-hoe to rip down the home...
I can hear the sounds of Empire crumbling.

-AC_Hacker

Last edited by AC_Hacker; 09-28-10 at 10:57 AM..
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-10, 10:51 PM   #17
TimJFowler
Apprentice EcoRenovator
 
TimJFowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 184
Thanks: 9
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
I don't think we have to be completely independent, but our current reliance is completely unacceptable. The incredible usage (read waste) that we have here is ridiculous.
Yes, our (U.S.) use of energy is ridiculous and incredibly wasteful. According to Amory Lovins at the Rocky Mountain Institute "Fully applying today's best efficiency technologies in a doubled-GDP 2025 economy would save half the projected U.S. oil use at half its forecast cost per barrel."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
So many simple and easy things could lower our energy consumption. Why is it so hard to get people to even make simple small changes?
Currently there is very little economic incentive to do so. When it becomes too painful / expensive people will scramble to reduce their energy use. For example; the gasoline price spikes of the 1970's and 2008.

I think this question could broadened to "Is Freedom from Fossil Fuels a Worthy Goal?" I think the answer is definitely yes. The question is am/are I/you/we/the country planning ahead and making incremental changes now or not.

I think that as fossil fuel demand grows and supplies are depleted that prices will rise, but not in a steady, smooth curve. The more I/you/we/the country can reduce our reliance on finite fuel sources with volatile supply and price now the better off we will be in the short and long term future.

All that said, I still use plenty of fossil fuels in various forms. But, I am making changes to reduce my and my family's use of fossil fuel. Here's hoping that I can stay ahead of that falling supply / rising price curve.

FWIW,
Tim
__________________
- DIY Adventures in Applied Sustainability -

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by TimJFowler; 09-29-10 at 01:53 PM.. Reason: fixed typos
TimJFowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-10, 11:23 PM   #18
Xringer
Lex Parsimoniae
 
Xringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Woburn, MA
Posts: 4,918
Thanks: 114
Thanked 250 Times in 230 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC_Hacker View Post

I can hear the sounds of Empire crumbling.

-AC_Hacker
Even on my little street of smaller,less expensive ranch style homes, it's starting.
At first it was little add-on rooms, now it's second floors.
And it a couple of cases, the whole house was replaced with a new
house that doubles it's sale price.


I'm starting to think that people are afraid to save their money these days.

They must think 'the end is near' and might as well spend those
bucks on a new home, or home improvements.
I've been thinking of investing in some index stocks.. DIA or GLD,
but have not done so. Mostly, my money is now in CDs..Crappy CDs!

BUT, we have been spending a considerable amount of money on our home.!.
If it's a purchase for the house, there is hardly any discussion.

Humm, maybe the end is near? May as well spend it, while it's still worth something..?.
Xringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-10, 07:35 AM   #19
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default Military Prepares for Petroleum Depletion...

Here's a thought-provoking little gem, written by a Pentagon think tank.



Called, "Fueling the Future Force: Preparing the Department of Defense for a Post-Petroleum Era", it states approximately when the Pentagon thinks Petroleum may not be readily available, and how to prepare for such a situation, and how long that preparation may take.

Here's the first paragraph:
The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) must prepare now to transition smoothly to a future in which it does not depend on petroleum. This is no small task: up to 77 percent of DOD’s massive energy needs – and most of the aircraft, ground vehicles, ships and weapons systems that DOD is purchasing today – depend on petroleum for fuel.
I think everyone at EcoRenovator should download and read this document.

Here is a paragraph from a critique of this report:
However, the report seems to have a poor grasp of where biofuels come from, the energy required to make them, and how to estimate the future availability of oil.
EcoRenovation is not just about saving money anymore...

Regards,

-AC_Hacker

Last edited by AC_Hacker; 09-29-10 at 07:46 AM..
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-10, 12:05 PM   #20
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default "The Joint Operating Environment 2010"

Here is another military study called, "The Joint Operating Environment 2010".

The full report can be found here.

Page 29 (PDF page 31) of this report has a very interesting Energy Summary:


The entire report is interesting enough to read in it's entirety...

-AC_Hacker

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	joe2010.gif
Views:	580
Size:	62.7 KB
ID:	960  
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design