![]() |
![]() |
#1 | |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 383
Thanks: 78
Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]() I had not seen this until today:
![]() Quoting the owner, who is a friend: Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 964
Thanks: 189
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
|
![]() Me wants! Me wants!
__________________
Ecorenovation - the bottomless piggy bank that tries to tame the energy hog. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
|
![]() Nice idea. Wonder how fast it is to split one log...
Did he make this or purchase it?
__________________
Current project - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. & To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by Daox; 12-02-10 at 06:22 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Master EcoRenovator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Western Wisconsin.
Posts: 913
Thanks: 127
Thanked 82 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]() I have not used one but I know of a lady who has one and likes it but she notes that it is really slow, so a maul is still recommended for the easy to split wood, my personal taste is to use a maul even when a gas powered splitter is around just because I an split wood 4-5 times faster by hand, but if it doesn't split with the first strike then it goes to the powered splitter.
Electric log splitters are also out there and work well from what I hear. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 383
Thanks: 78
Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]() I'm pretty sure he bought it, though if you have the right piston, you could make one. The dual pumps, of the different sizes is the key. This is probably slow, but it saves your back.
An electric powered hydraulic pump would be fast, quiet and very efficient. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 383
Thanks: 78
Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]() Here is the same exact unit from Sears:
Sears: Online department store featuring appliances, tools, fitness equipment and more ![]() Does anyone know of an electric powered wood splitter? Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 12-07-10 at 11:01 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
|
![]() There are a bunch on amazon. Largest one seems to be ~7 ton.
5 ton - Amazon.com: Grizzly H8171 Hydraulic / Electric Log Splitter: Patio, Lawn & Garden 7 ton - Amazon.com: Powerhouse XM-380 7-Ton Electric Hydraulic Log Splitter: Patio, Lawn & Garden
__________________
Current project - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. & To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 383
Thanks: 78
Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]() Thanks, Tim -- I like the more compact under-slung design of the 7-ton unit you linked to. It weighs a bit less than the 5-ton, too. But the prices are a lot higher.
A possible method of making the manual unit faster is lay the log on it *before* retracting the piston, and when the log drops down, close the valve, and you only have to pump it closed again a little bit... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 101
Thanks: 13
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Also if you replace the handle on the faster side with a shorter one then it could be used quicker as you do not have to pull as far for full movement, the down side is you will have even less torque but that is what the handle on the other side is for.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Helper EcoRenovator
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 66
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() That would probably be way too slow if you are looking at a pile of wood to split. If you are splitting by hand, a maul and wedges work surprisingly well. Most of the effort is bending over and picking up the pieces (if you are doing it right).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|