06-01-14, 06:32 PM | #281 |
DIY Geek
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 401
Thanks: 74
Thanked 83 Times in 73 Posts
|
May produced 632kWh from my 4.4kW PV system. $34.43 electric bill last month (last 8 days of April, first 22 days of May). Best day was a 25.7kWh day on May 5th. Two of my three best days this year were in May.
Collected 2.65MWh year to date. If I could only figure out how to ground mount another 10 panels in the yard to withstand a 3-second gust of 160mph to kick my electric bill down to the $7.57 base fee and roll some credits into summer to cover a portion of the A/C bill. As it is, the A/C ran 88 hours last month. Last edited by where2; 06-01-14 at 10:48 PM.. |
06-01-14, 09:08 PM | #282 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 383
Thanks: 78
Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts
|
My brother has a system, but I do not, yet.
His system (6.37kW) collected 774kWh in May, and 797kWh in April. 2.98 MWh for this year to date. They are coming up on the 1 year anniversary of having their system online. Lifetime output (a few weeks shy of the full year) is 6.92MWh. Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 06-01-14 at 09:13 PM.. |
06-02-14, 08:35 AM | #283 | |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Delhi, NY
Posts: 332
Thanks: 20
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
|
Quote:
The bottom line is that Koch is an oil and energy conglomerate (read monopoly) not simply happy with the fact that Koch industries made him nine billion dollars last year, he wants to control ALL the energy. PV and wind represent autonomy to him and money he is not getting when we use EV's (electric vehicles) or sell energy back to the grid. So ALEC is attempting to control the PV, etc. and deter new PV systems by individuals. PV systems established by power companies are OK because the wealth, through energy, is still controlled by the power company and thus they have the advantage of charging anything they want along with the fact that they eliminate those of us who are working towards energy independence. No one told Charles Koch that the sun is still free and the energy from fossil fuel he's selling is still energy that was created by the sun! So think about this, why should any power company have the right to zero out our gain? Do they zero out customers' bills every year? Last month Germany produced 74% of its power from alternates, I'm wondering if the Koch brothers can stop that movement. The twenty first century will be the century of alternate energy, no country will be able to compete in the industrial world without adopting a massive alternate energy infrastructure. China, Germany and a bunch of other countries already know that... we're already behind. Rob |
|
06-02-14, 07:48 PM | #284 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SC
Posts: 2,923
Thanks: 172
Thanked 564 Times in 463 Posts
|
Yes it very familiar
The Koch brothers are going after solar panels - Salon.com Duke Energy is trying to make us look like the bad guys. http://www.duke-energy.com/south-car...ergy/solar.asp Last edited by pinballlooking; 11-17-14 at 01:27 PM.. |
06-02-14, 11:53 PM | #285 | |
DIY Geek
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 401
Thanks: 74
Thanked 83 Times in 73 Posts
|
Quote:
I still do not understand why a system with meters that keep track of what you send from your PV system to the grid and what your home recovers from the grid cannot determine what to charge for grid infrastructure costs? The Utilities always seem to lean toward "fixed monthly cost" solar connection pricing models, in which case why is my distribution charge without a PV system all relative to the total kWh consumed? I continue to automate my home in an effort to minimize my net meter kWh every month. |
|
06-03-14, 09:51 AM | #286 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SC
Posts: 2,923
Thanks: 172
Thanked 564 Times in 463 Posts
|
I talked to one environmental group that was working with duke energy and they said duke was pushing for a fixed charge pre KW installed per month like $5 pre KW.
That would not be good for me at all 62.50 + meter fee 70.79 + new solar fee 71.79 a month + my eclectic usage. This sounds fair to them. If they can get this approved I need battery tech to improve at a lower cost. Maybe EV batteries that we no longer work in cars but are great for solar storage will be cost effective. I guess I would switch to gas dryer and gas stove and look at AC coupling to get off grid. For right now I have to wait and go to every meeting I can to help promote good change. It is funny electric companies want guaranteed returns on all their investments but we invest in solar under current rules and they want to change the rules to and kill our investments in solar. |
06-04-14, 07:11 AM | #287 | |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Delhi, NY
Posts: 332
Thanks: 20
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
|
Quote:
While I have Solar World modules here I'm wondering if this isn't a way to cut diminishing PV install costs and slow down US PV growth. Hike the price of modules and hike up the intertie costs to slow things down. These guys are ruthless, I don't put anything past them! What Duke is doing to you is a crime and I know people on ConEd in the lower part of the state with the same type of fees. Keep the money in the monopoly, keep control and keep high end user costs. Rob Last edited by pinballlooking; 06-21-21 at 06:42 PM.. |
|
06-04-14, 12:12 PM | #288 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SC
Posts: 2,923
Thanks: 172
Thanked 564 Times in 463 Posts
|
All their rates have to be approved but the give big money to everyone in the Gov and they get a good return on their investment. I guess that is why they keep doing it.
I have not had any issues with my Enphase 215 microinverters but a solar installer sold new unused extra one on ebay. It was a decent deal so I picked up an extra one. I have 54 microinverters one will go bad at some point. They have a 25 year warranty but it will take some time to get a replacement. So now if one goes bad I can just swap it out with the spare microinverter. Mark |
06-04-14, 03:03 PM | #289 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SC
Posts: 2,923
Thanks: 172
Thanked 564 Times in 463 Posts
|
Duke Energy just emailed me
Historic solar law signed in South Carolina This week, South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley signed into law a consensus solar bill that will open up the state for more solar power development. Supported by utilities like Duke Energy - plus a number of environmental and consumer groups - the law opens up the possibility of Duke Energy expanding its generation base in the state by building solar power facilities. It also opens the way for residents to lease solar panels without paying high up-front installation costs. Plus, it includes special programs to bring solar to schools, churches and other nonprofits. The South Carolina Public Service Commission is now tasked with implementing the new law. As a first step, it is expected to examine net metering, which is a billing option that credits solar customers for the full retail value of the energy they generate and send back to the grid. Those customers remain connected to the electric grid 100 percent of the time and use the utility to balance their electricity needs when their solar panels can't produce enough power. In many states, net metering rules are being modified to be fairer to all customers - solar and non-solar. Now we wait and see what South Carolina Public Service Commission comes up with. It looks like I will be grandfathered in "Through December 31, 2020" Last edited by pinballlooking; 06-04-14 at 03:05 PM.. |
06-05-14, 11:03 AM | #290 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SC
Posts: 2,923
Thanks: 172
Thanked 564 Times in 463 Posts
|
I just got the word that the Zero out date was changed yesterday. Duke power will not zero us out this year and the new zero out date will be March 1. This is good news and I will be able to push or carry over my spring surplus to summer and then winter.
NetZero could be within reach! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|