EcoRenovator  

Go Back   EcoRenovator > Improvements > Conservation
Advanced Search
 


Blog 60+ Home Energy Saving Tips Recent Posts


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-11, 02:53 PM   #11
strider3700
Master EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver Island BC
Posts: 745
Thanks: 23
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Default

up here we get the same thing. Subsidized first visit with a free follow up and you need both and show the improvements to qualify for the tax credit.

strider3700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-11, 06:21 PM   #12
RobertSmalls
Journeyman EcoRenovator
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 344
Thanks: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Of course, despite my work, sealing is still the biggest deal. With the blower door test and pressure set to 50 pascals, the flow rate was 2180 cfm. He thinks that with his suggestions I can easily knock that in half.
How many air changes per hour does that work out to?

Last edited by Daox; 03-15-12 at 11:34 AM..
RobertSmalls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-11, 06:49 PM   #13
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
Default

Well, house is roughly 1650 sq/ft. Volume is split between 8 and 10 foot ceilings, so we'll say 8.5 for guestimates. Cubic volume looks to be 14,000ft^3. So, 2180 * 60 = 130,800 cfh. 130,800 / 14,000 = 9.34. Looks to be about 9.34 air changes an hour. However, that is at -50 pascals. To compare, with all the exhaust fans running (two bath vents & kitchen stove vent), furnace running, and dryer on the house only dropped to -8.5 pascals. So, its pretty leaky. But, I don't know if 9.34 air changes an hour is accurate number unless all air change tests are done @ 50 pascals.
__________________
Current project -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Daox; 03-15-12 at 11:35 AM.. Reason: correct CFM numbers
Daox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-11, 08:25 PM   #14
RobertSmalls
Journeyman EcoRenovator
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 344
Thanks: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Here's a couple of articles that give context to your ACH50 numbers:

We have passed the preliminary blower door test. - Passive House DC
Acing the Blower Door Test with Miranda Homes | Earth Advantage Institute
RobertSmalls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-11, 12:07 PM   #15
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
Default

Interesting read. Considering an energy star house has to only meet 7 ACH, 9 doesn't sound so bad... Still, a lot of room for improvement though.
__________________
Current project -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Daox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-12, 10:51 AM   #16
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
Default

I just scheduled my follow up test for mid March. I'm really not ready for it yet (will have to scramble to do a few things), but apparently I have to do it before a year has passed since the first test to qualify for the tax credit. I was under the impression I could just call them back whenever and use the tax credit for that year, but apparently that is not the case.

Anyway, I've done a bunch of air sealing mainly on the 2nd floor and hope to do more sealing before the auditor comes. I know my basement is horribly leaky, so I'm thinking of attempting to seal the basement door and any holes between the floors with caulk and expanding foam. Unfortunately my furnace doesn't have a dedicated intake, so it must still use inside air, so sealing the basement up isn't the best option right now.
__________________
Current project -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Daox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-12, 12:37 PM   #17
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
Default

Well, I had the audit done this morning. The results were pretty disappointing.

CFM for the 1st test at 50 pascals was 2180 CFM. This calculates out to roughly 9.3 ACH (air changes per hour). The new number I got today was 2010. This calculates out to 8.6 ACH. So, not even quite a 10% reduction.

However, the auditor did say I did a good job with what I had done. Besides sealing up the basement rim joist area, all the other leakage is mainly coming from BETWEEN the floors or between the 2nd floor ceiling and the attic along the angled areas of my roof (very similar to a 1.5 story).

So, I'll probably start with the basement. The current plan would be rigid foam that is kept in place with 1 part foam (great stuff). I've avoided doing this mainly because its going to be a big pain in the butt. My basement walls are roughly 2 feet thick and getting in the cavities that deep not only to foam but also just to clean them out is not going to be fun. The other two sides (joists running parallel to the wall) are also going to be tricky due to space restrictions as well.

After the basement, I'm going to have to start cutting into things to seal them up. At that point I'm not sure if it would be better to just work from the outside and add rigid foam. I'll check that out more once I get that far.


For those who don't know what ACH is good/bad here is a general chart from Higgy's energy audit, and passive house requires .6 ACH or less!

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	achchart.jpg
Views:	770
Size:	50.2 KB
ID:	2201  
__________________
Current project -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Daox is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (03-15-12), TimJFowler (03-15-12)
Old 03-15-12, 12:44 PM   #18
TimJFowler
Apprentice EcoRenovator
 
TimJFowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 184
Thanks: 9
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Well, I had the audit done this morning. The results were pretty disappointing.

CFM for the 1st test at 50 pascals was 2180 CFM. This calculates out to roughly 9.3 ACH (air changes per hour). The new number I got today was 2010. This calculates out to 8.6 ACH. So, not even quite a 10% reduction.

However, the auditor did say I did a good job with what I had done. Besides sealing up the basement rim joist area, all the other leakage is mainly coming from BETWEEN the floors or between the 2nd floor ceiling and the attic along the angled areas of my roof (very similar to a 1.5 story).
It's still progress - not as much as you want - but progress! It sounds like you've picked much of the low-hanging fruit and the next improvements will require more effort.

I'm in a similar situation and need to do some ROI calcs to figure out which project to do next.

Good Luck,
Tim

__________________
- DIY Adventures in Applied Sustainability -

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
TimJFowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design