12-02-09, 02:00 AM | #1 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 961
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
|
In-line diode to reduce power
Ever since AC_Hacker posted his Rice Cooker Eco-hack, I've been thinking about the in-line diode trick he used to reduce the heating element's wattage. We have an electric kettle at home, 1.7 liters and 2000W (1960W actually, 8.5A@230V). I would like to have it use less power, say 1200W-1500W, since the load on the kitchen's electrics would be reduced, and I don't mind the wait.
Over at EcoModder I did a test on how much power is needed to boil 500ml (app. 2 cups) of room temperature water. The electric kettle took 3 minutes and used 58Wh. Today, I hooked up a diode (400V, 9A) to see the difference in time/power consumption. Well, I didn't finish the test, because the diode overheated and now there is the smell of burned electronics in the whole house But here is what I noticed: At the beginning, the power consumption was 980W, as predicted. But at some point it suddenly almost doubled to 1850W. By mid-way through the test I could tell the diode was getting HOT, all of the cables were getting warm, and the smell was getting more intense. When I decided to end the test, just as I turned the kettle off, there was a -CLICK- from the diode. Since I finished early, the water didn't boil, but it did get pretty hot. I used 49Wh during the 2.5 minutes it was on. So, I guess that the diode trick won't work in my case (too much power?), maybe I should use a bigger diode (at least 20A)? Or just give up, and maybe buy a smaller kettle (1.2 liters, 1200W)? What would be ideal for me is a kettle with two heating elements, say 800W and 1200W, which can be turned on and off independently, but they don't make those Enough of me, this thread is for any info on using an in-line diode to lower power usage. Has anyone had more luck than I did? |
12-02-09, 06:04 AM | #2 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
|
I understand why AC Hacker did his mod to the rice cooker. The heated thermal mass continues to cook the rice after heat has been removed.
If you are simply heating water for tea (or whatever), I think it would actually be more efficient to keep it heating faster. You need a set amount of power to get water from X temp to Y temp. The longer it takes to get from X to Y, the more heat is going to be lost. So, unless I'm missing something, keeping it at 2000W should be more efficient.
__________________
Current project - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. & To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
12-02-09, 09:36 AM | #3 | |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 961
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
12-02-09, 11:27 AM | #4 |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
|
Cup of Tea...
Piwoslaw,
Sorry to hear about your diode, I can certainly understand how the dreadful smell of burning electronics would interfere with the simple pleasure of drinking tea. I've thought about the rice-cooker experiment, and I realize that what small improvement I may have made, will not likely economically balance the materials and labor I invested. But the improvement in knowledge, and the fact that I actually acted to try to make an improvement was well worth the investment. Semi-conductors fail as a short circuit, and the silicon changes from being a semi-conductor, into a molten conductor. I'm surprised by what you reported, "all of the cables were getting warm", I think the cables probably get warm every time you use the kettle... am I mistaken here? I assume that you are using a teapot that has the heating element in the water, rather than putting water in a pot and putting the pot on a burner on top of the stove, or a hot-plate. Yeah, I think Daox is right. You have a certain amount of work to do to boil water, and whether you do the work slowly or quickly, the same amount of work is required. Just brainstorming here, but some approaches I can think of: 1. Start with warmer water. Leave the water you plan to make tea from in a container, maybe in the sun. 2. Heat up the minimum amount of water you need. This is where a microwave could be useful. 3. Use a different fluid with a lower specific heat. But let's face it, for making tea, water has few substitutes. 4. Capture the heat lost in heating. If your pot is on top of a heating element, there is heat loss around the sides of the pot. Possibilities here. 5. Use a less expensive form of heat. a. A mini solar batch heater for preheat.6. Burn 'junk mail' to make tea. I don't know if Poland has the same junk mail problem as the US, but perhaps you could make a small stove for this purpose. By the way Piwoslaw, I seem to recall that some time back, you said that you had or could borrow a book on DIY radiant floor heating. If I am correct, was there anything in that book about building up a layered radiant floor from materials like sheet rock, etc. such as Maxis did, rather than using concrete? Best Regards, -AC_Hacker |
12-02-09, 12:31 PM | #5 |
Lex Parsimoniae
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Woburn, MA
Posts: 4,918
Thanks: 114
Thanked 250 Times in 230 Posts
|
About 40 years ago, my wife got me a little reading lamp for night time reading.
It clamps on the headboard of the bed. There was a problem. It was WAY too bright! So, I took it into my ham shack and installed a little silicon diode in-line with the 120 AC. That little lamp has been working since 1968 and has never needed a new bulb.. But, it's only used a few hours a week. |
12-02-09, 02:41 PM | #6 | ||
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 961
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-02-09, 08:56 PM | #7 | |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 14
Thanked 257 Times in 241 Posts
|
a quiz about AC power - diyAudio
Quote:
__________________
To my surprise, shortly after Naomi Wu gave me a bit of fame for making good use of solar power, Allie Moore got really jealous of her... |
|
12-10-09, 12:35 AM | #8 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 961
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
|
I bought a 500W travel heating coil for boiling water and did a test today: It took about 3 times longer to boil 0.5 liter of water than in the 2000W electric jug, and used the same 58Wh. So I'll stick to the jug, unless I need a small amount of hot water (the jug has a minimum of 0.5 liter).
|
12-10-09, 07:04 PM | #9 | |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
|
is coil immersed?
Quote:
Also, it might be interesting to see how much power is consumed when you heat up a cup of water, that is assuming that you make tea a cup at a time, rather than make it a pot at a time. My guess is that it will take <30 Wh per cup of tea... Best Regards, -AC_Hacker Last edited by AC_Hacker; 12-10-09 at 07:08 PM.. |
|
12-11-09, 02:42 PM | #10 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 961
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
|
All the way.
The reason I used 500ml instead of a 200-250ml cup is because the previous tests were with that volume (it's the minimum for the electric kettle). In the original test I wrapped a fleece blanket around the jug to see if insulating would change anything, but the time it took to boil was so short that no considerable amount of heat could escape. On the other hand, boiling with the 500W coil took almost 15 minutes, so insulation would help there. But when heating a small cup the time would be down to 4-6 minutes again. Now for something totally different: Would the diode trick work on an electric motor? The 100W circulation pump in our central heating furnace is a little oversized (as is the 27kW furnace, 18-20kW would be much more efficient). I'm wondering whether an inline diode would slow it down, reduce it's power draw and by how much? A slower pump would also be much quieter. Unfortunately this one is welded into the furnace's plumbing so no easy way to just replace it with something more efficient My Grandma's furnace has a pump which is not only replaceable, but has 3 different speed/power settings. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|