EcoRenovator  

Go Back   EcoRenovator > Improvements > Appliances & Gadgets
Advanced Search
 


Blog 60+ Home Energy Saving Tips Recent Posts Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-23-10, 03:37 AM   #1
Piwoslaw
Super Moderator
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 960
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
Default Increasing transformer efficiency

All electronics are really DC powered, even though they are fed AC from the grid, which means that each TV, DVD, SAT, stereo, computer, etc., has a transformer+rectifier inside. How efficient is that? Would it be more efficient to have one larger transformer supplying power to the LCD/DVD/SAT/home theater bundle in the living room (hacking those devices to directly input DC)?

From Wikipedia - Tranformer, Energy losses:
Quote:
An ideal transformer would have no energy losses, and would be 100% efficient. In practical transformers energy is dissipated in the windings, core, and surrounding structures. Larger transformers are generally more efficient, and those rated for electricity distribution usually perform better than 98%.

Experimental transformers using superconducting windings achieve efficiencies of 99.85%. While the increase in efficiency is small, when applied to large heavily loaded transformers the annual savings in energy losses are significant.

A small transformer, such as a plug-in "wall wart" power adapter commonly used for low-power consumer electronics devices, may be as low as 20% efficient, with considerable energy loss even when not supplying any power to the device.
I've looked around for info on the efficiency of the AC-to-DC conversion in typical electronics devices, but no luck. Only some random talk of full-load and no-load efficiencies, windings, cores, eddies, hysteresis, etc. Most efficiency/load charts seem to be for industrial sized, multi-kVA transformers. From tid-bits of information I've pieced together it appears that some transformers' efficiency increases with load, while for others the maximum is in the 30%-60% load range, after which it decreases.

So the question remains: Several small transformers, or one larger one?

Piwoslaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-10, 06:15 AM   #2
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
Default

Well, since everything is designed to use AC, you'd have to hack every single item to run off DC. Even then, you don't know what voltage its running inside it, or it might be running multiple voltages...

I think that with modern devices and the emphasis on power saving features that has come about in more recent years, things are definitely getting a lot better.
__________________
Current project -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Daox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-10, 08:21 AM   #3
NiHaoMike
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
NiHaoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 14
Thanked 257 Times in 241 Posts
Default

In general, one large power supply is more efficient than several smaller ones. In addition, in a network environment, you then get additional losses converting AC to DC then back to AC in the UPS.

One of my current projects is the "Allie Moore IPS-35A15V", a high efficiency power supply for my home network. It will supply 12-15V (programmable by a BMS or PMS) at up to 35A to float charge a 12V battery and operate loads. Most home networking equipment use 12V so they can simply be connected to the 12V bus. Other devices use DC/DC converters. (I also plan to develop the "Allie Moore ATX-400DC12V", a 12V DC input ATX power supply.)
__________________
To my surprise, shortly after Naomi Wu gave me a bit of fame for making good use of solar power, Allie Moore got really jealous of her...
NiHaoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-10, 03:12 PM   #4
Clev
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 74
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
All electronics are really DC powered, even though they are fed AC from the grid, which means that each TV, DVD, SAT, stereo, computer, etc., has a transformer+rectifier inside. How efficient is that? Would it be more efficient to have one larger transformer supplying power to the LCD/DVD/SAT/home theater bundle in the living room (hacking those devices to directly input DC)?

From Wikipedia - Tranformer, Energy losses:


I've looked around for info on the efficiency of the AC-to-DC conversion in typical electronics devices, but no luck. Only some random talk of full-load and no-load efficiencies, windings, cores, eddies, hysteresis, etc. Most efficiency/load charts seem to be for industrial sized, multi-kVA transformers. From tid-bits of information I've pieced together it appears that some transformers' efficiency increases with load, while for others the maximum is in the 30%-60% load range, after which it decreases.

So the question remains: Several small transformers, or one larger one?
Most electronics nowadays use switching power supplies instead of transformers. They're far more efficient, and can handle a wide range of AC (and sometimes DC) voltages.

Combining power supplies makes sense in a single area where multiple devices reside (as in NiHaoMike's example), but higher voltage moves with less loss over the same wires, so it's more lossy to run, say, 12V all over the house than it is to have individual power supplies tapping off 120V or 240V.
Clev is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Clev For This Useful Post:
Servicetech (11-09-13)
Old 11-09-13, 02:07 PM   #5
Servicetech
Apprentice EcoRenovator
 
Servicetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 267
Thanks: 108
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clev View Post
Most electronics nowadays use switching power supplies instead of transformers. They're far more efficient, and can handle a wide range of AC (and sometimes DC) voltages.

Combining power supplies makes sense in a single area where multiple devices reside (as in NiHaoMike's example), but higher voltage moves with less loss over the same wires, so it's more lossy to run, say, 12V all over the house than it is to have individual power supplies tapping off 120V or 240V.
AV recievers are now starting to use SMPS, they are one of the last "holdouts". Furnace transformers are still the old school style, I don't know if they will ever go SMPS.

Servicetech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design