EcoRenovator  

Go Back   EcoRenovator > Improvements > Renovations & New Construction
Advanced Search
 


Blog 60+ Home Energy Saving Tips Recent Posts


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-14, 03:17 PM   #11
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtojohn View Post
I ran few tests today. We had a lot of scattered clouds so conditions we less than optimal. However...Its not looking good. I have 4 equal sized pieces of ship lap. 1 original satin green, 2 green with ceramics, 3 aluminum radiant barrier base coat (somebody said this works) and 4 aluminum radiant barrier paint for proof of performance.
Siding was laid out together facing up in direct sun through out the day . There was an air gap underneath to simulate a hollow wall. I checked the temps off and on throughout the day with a IR thermometer with a fresh 9volt. Temps for 1-3 averaged within 1 degree of each other, 135f surface and 111f on the backside. 4 was up to 101f on the surface and a few degrees over ambient on the back. I might try the difference with the siding upright like its on the wall in case there's any difference. A gloss finish might help reflect more heat.
Wow, thanks for the test!

Looks like aluminum barrier paint is very effective.

Do you have any ceramic left?? Might be interesting to see if that stuff + aluminum paint improved the aluminum reflectivity.

Best,

-AC

__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker...
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-14, 10:18 AM   #12
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
Default

Do you have any pictures of your test setup? This is something I'd be interested in writing up for the blog.
__________________
Current project -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Daox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-14, 12:47 AM   #13
gtojohn
Journeyman EcoRenovator
 
gtojohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 314
Thanks: 39
Thanked 50 Times in 45 Posts
Default

I'll snap a few pictures for you. Weather is forecast for full sun the next few days. I do have most of the powder left. I was thinking about testing a gloss finish and or green base with a clear coat with ceramic added. I really wish I could make this work, maybe a radiant barrier with green tint... I was impressed by how well the silver paint works unfortunately it might look out of place on my siding!
gtojohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-14, 11:16 PM   #14
gtojohn
Journeyman EcoRenovator
 
gtojohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 314
Thanks: 39
Thanked 50 Times in 45 Posts
Default




gtojohn is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gtojohn For This Useful Post:
Daox (08-08-14)
Old 08-07-14, 11:48 PM   #15
gtojohn
Journeyman EcoRenovator
 
gtojohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 314
Thanks: 39
Thanked 50 Times in 45 Posts
Default

I took a lot of reading over the last several days. Surface temps varied some, the satin was always a few degrees cooler than the 2 ceramic boards. The aluminum painted board well showed well under but...that seems to have been more because of its reflectivity and its effect on my thermometer. Most ir guns compernsate for .98 emissivity and most aluminums rate under .2 .Making this more obvious was when I measured the unpainted back sides of the same siding samples. The satin averaged 7 degrees cooler than the other 3 samples. The back side of the 3 samples coated with radiant barriers and ceramics were the same regardless of coating. An over simplified account for temperature readings after 4 hrs of full sun would be...Satin finished green surface 134f, back side 114f. Ceramic beaded samples 141f, back 121f. Aluminum radiant barrier paint sample surface 104f (not reading correctly), back side 121F. The ceramic bead additive makes the surface rough and gives it a matte finish. I believe that is the cause of the addition heat gain. Based on these results I'd like to test a gloss finish for any reduction on temps.
gtojohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-14, 12:07 AM   #16
gtojohn
Journeyman EcoRenovator
 
gtojohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 314
Thanks: 39
Thanked 50 Times in 45 Posts
Default

One more thing, about ceramic...I took a piece of green ceramic tile, left it with the siding samples. Same surface temps as the the warmest 3, back side measurement same 141F as the surface 141F. It has no magical heat reflective properties, and no great insulative value. At least with the wood siding there was a 20F difference between front and back.
gtojohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-14, 03:23 PM   #17
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default

You might want to check out my Space Blanket Test.

-AC
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker...
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-14, 03:24 AM   #18
Ormston
Apprentice EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 131
Thanks: 13
Thanked 35 Times in 32 Posts
Default

I did an experiment with the ceramic balls you add to paint around 6 years ago.
At the time I was working for a company that had a thermal imaging camera so used that for testing.
I constructed a wooden box with a light pendant inside as a heat source and painted 2 sides with white paint and the other 2 with the same white paint and ceramic beads added.

The sides with ceramic beads added were showing hotter on the thermal imaging camera so I gave up and binned them.

Steve
Ormston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-14, 10:40 AM   #19
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormston View Post
The sides with ceramic beads added were showing hotter on the thermal imaging camera so I gave up and binned them.
Maybe we should reverse out expectations and use these little reflective spheres to coat solar heat collector surfaces, since they seem to be failing so completely.

-AC
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker...
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-14, 11:47 AM   #20
Mikesolar
Master EcoRenovator
 
Mikesolar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 958
Thanks: 40
Thanked 158 Times in 150 Posts
Default

The ceramic is acting just how a brick on the house does. It will hold the heat and release it slower so, while it is not so good for cooling the house, it would help in heating the house. They say my double brick (no insulation) house has an R value of 8 at best yet it costs less to heat than most houses with R22 or greater batt insulation. Mass is good.

Mikesolar is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mikesolar For This Useful Post:
buffalobillpatrick (09-10-14)
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design