09-24-19, 04:41 PM | #1 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Driftless Region, North America, Earth, Solar System, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy,Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 116
Thanks: 13
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
|
Earthtube-fed air conditioning?
I have an idea that I haven't been able to find really discussed elsewhere online, so I thought I'd throw it out here.
Basically, instead of using earth tubes to directly condition a space, you would use it to feed cooled air to a 2-hose portable air conditioner. Potential advantages: 1. Increased efficiency for the air conditioner 2. Eliminates mold concerns associated with earth tubes since heat exchange air and 3. Portable A/Cs are relatively inexpensive ~$400, can easily be upgraded/swapped out. 4. Earth tube design and materials could be simplified since mold isn't so much of a concern. 5. Simplicity/fail-safe nature of air as a fluid. No leaks, special fluids to worry about. Potential Disadvantages 1. Alternative GSHP, or A/C's could be inherently more efficient with less work. 2. Static pressure in earth tubes, need for booster fans 3. Cost/work involved in excavation for tubes. Questions: 1. How much of an efficiency gain would the air conditioner see from pre-cooled air? 2. What sort of depth of pipe would be necessary? (a/c only) and in what kind of climates? 3. Thermodynamic effect of condensation in the earth tube? Cheers! |
10-09-19, 11:24 AM | #2 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Driftless Region, North America, Earth, Solar System, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy,Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 116
Thanks: 13
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
|
Hard to dig up solid information on the impact of outside air temperature and air conditioner efficiency. The closest study I've been able to find is here:
https://aceee.org/files/proceedings/...193-000015.pdf Figure 3 & 4 show massive power consumption differences (0.2KW at -5 to 0 deg. F difference to inside building vs 2.5-3KW at 30-35 deg. F difference) Basically, 15 times less power used. The question is teasing out how much of that is simply the difference in building cooling load. If the air tubes can cool 90 deg. F outside air to 65 deg. F (pretty average summer soil temp for only a few feet underground in Wisconsin) and the air conditioner reduces that to say 50 deg. F then could we say that the earth tubes are doing roughly 63% of the cooling? My totally uneducated, ignorant calculations would suggest the A/C would have to work about 3x less. So would a 11 SEER $400 portable A/C combined with earth tubes perform similar to a 33 SEER $1,600 minisplit? |
10-09-19, 06:42 PM | #3 |
Less usage=Cheaper bills
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 940
Thanks: 41
Thanked 117 Times in 91 Posts
|
The entering air of an AC condenser being 65 degrees instead of 90 degrees doesn't reduce the power consumption by that much. My compressor uses about 2200 watts with a 90 degree entering temperature and 1900 or so with a 65 degree entering temperature and the output capacity at the evaporator is more but the total likely doesn't end up being more than about 15%.
The best source of information for entering condenser temperature, power usage, and output with a TXV driven unit can be found from HVAC manufacturers information. Goodman has a solid product specification sheet for their units. https://www.goodmanmfg.com/pdfviewer....pdf?view=true One more important factor - An AC condenser requires unimpeded airflow, they can't handle much static pressure without losing flow, if you are adding a blower to push air through an earth tube, you MUST add that power back in, which could cause a net loss in efficiency. |
10-13-19, 01:20 PM | #4 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 120
Thanks: 26
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
If i remember correctly some did on this blog built one of these a couple yrs ago for his air coupled outside unit. Maybe do a search and i’ll also see if i can find my bookmark
|
10-23-19, 12:13 PM | #5 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Driftless Region, North America, Earth, Solar System, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy,Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 116
Thanks: 13
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
|
If the 15% reduction turns out to be accurate, it would seem to be the final nail in the coffin for the idea. It looks like a high SEER mini-split would be the far more economical choice, and a D/C solar one could make it completely off-grid.
I like the fail-safe simplicity of earth tubes, but extracting the cooling while isolating a potentially contaminated air stream in an efficient way might not be doable. It would be interesting to see some real world results from that Blog Ron342! |
Tags |
a/c, air conditioner, earth tube, geothermal, portable ac |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|