EcoRenovator  

Go Back   EcoRenovator > Improvements > Geothermal & Heat Pumps
Advanced Search
 


Blog 60+ Home Energy Saving Tips Recent Posts


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-05-13, 10:22 PM   #13
jeff5may
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: elizabethtown, ky, USA
Posts: 2,428
Thanks: 431
Thanked 619 Times in 517 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to jeff5may
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradC View Post
The other thing about 410A vs 22 or 290 is it has quite a high latent heat capacity so you need less mass flow for the same refrigerating capacity.
I'm a bit confused. Can you help clear some things up for me?

I thought that r22/propane and r12/isobutane were kind of equal opposites. The hc's have large latent heat but small density, the fc's have small latent heat but high density, when compared to each other. R410a plays the middle, having high density and medium latent heat. When the terms are combined, R410a comes out a winner at medium-high latent heat-density.

Does this make sense?

Also, you stated the r290 running in the 410a compressor would have reduced capacity versus the nameplate. Would the compressor also be consuming less power in this condition? What ill effects would the compressor running out of its range have besides being underemployed?

I'm speaking ideally here, not practically. Just trying to gain some clarity and straighten out my thoughts on the different refrigerants. The research on the subject isn't exactly in common english.
jeff5may is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design