03-30-12, 12:38 AM | #1 |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
|
Energy Performance Score...
I just became aware of a system that is being used in Oregon to rate how energy efficient a house is.
The system is called EPS (Energy Performance Score). Apparently it is easily and economically conducted, and accurately predicts the amount of energy that will be used in operating a building. Here is a brief video: Energy Trust of Oregon And here is a document that provides a bit more information: http://www.imt.org/files/FileUpload/...IMT-Oregon.pdf Do other states (or countries) have similar rating systems in place for rating a house's energy efficiency? -AC
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker... Last edited by AC_Hacker; 03-30-12 at 05:04 PM.. |
03-30-12, 12:51 PM | #2 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 961
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
|
Poland (and the rest of EU, I believe), has an energy certificate:
It shows the building's yearly non-renewable energy usage in kWh per sq. meter of floor area. It is required for every new building, and for buildings undergoing a large renovation. It was implemented a few years ago to help buyers choose buildings with lower heating costs, which would force builders/sellers to invest in efficiency. In practice people haven't learned to pay attention to it. I guess that a pretty house is more important an efficient one
__________________
Ecorenovation - the bottomless piggy bank that tries to tame the energy hog. |
03-30-12, 03:21 PM | #3 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
|
The only thing I have available relates direclty to money:
Total energy usage: Electricity usage: Natural Gas usage:
__________________
Current project - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. & To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
03-30-12, 06:16 PM | #4 |
Helper EcoRenovator
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Gresham OR
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Hi,
As Piwoslaw says most of Europe uses an energy certificate. I know Germany does. It does help when you're trying to decide which home to buy or the value of a house you're trying to sell. When you buy a car you expect the EPA sticker to tell you how efficient the vehicle is- why would you not want the same information for a house? When comparing houses you now have an additional factor (efficiency) to compare. I like the idea. I think it has led to more fuel efficient cars and hopefully it will lead to more energy efficient homes. It also keeps sellers honest about energy use. This is the first time I have heard it is offered in Oregon, good news, thanks AC. |
03-30-12, 08:38 PM | #5 | |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
|
Quote:
In talking to them, it seems that Oregon is set up to only certify new construction. When I spoke briefly of what I am doing, he asked if I had made any substantial modifications to the structure. When I said no, that I had avoided any changes to the structure, he said that the Oregon Energy Performance Score system would not apply to me. But when I went into details, and described going down to the studs and filling the walls with air-tight layers of rigid foam sheets, he said that it seemed that I fell somewhere between their customary categories. When I told him that I was trying to follow Passive House Practices, he really started to get interested and paid close attention. He sent me a blizzard of documents detailing interesting incentives, guidelines, and standards. In deed there is a gulf between what average home owners might do to improve energy efficiency, and what is common practice here on ER. Well folks, it looks like we might be breaking new ground. ER might as well be 'Energy Revolutionary'. Viva ER! -AC
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker... |
|
05-07-12, 10:15 AM | #6 | |
Helper EcoRenovator
Join Date: May 2012
Location: house
Posts: 50
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
It created ALOT of jobs for energy auditors & raised public awareness of energy efficiency. We tried to implement this in PA, but Realtors, Developers & Construction lobby defeated it. They do not want an informed consumer. |
|
07-10-13, 07:38 AM | #7 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Arab, AL
Posts: 491
Thanks: 109
Thanked 49 Times in 43 Posts
|
Energy Scores
I wish I'd started caring about efficiency much earlier, I could've saved a lot of money over time. After reading about others having a home energy audit several times, I finally decided to quit being a cheapskate and have one done.
I didn't do too bad, but I do have a couple of areas that need attention. The worst is leaky HVAC ducts, about 7.7% of my conditioned air is lost in the attic. Attached below is our score. A real part of the reason I did this was to prove to myself before having a new HVAC unit installed that it would be correctly sized. If I never heard, "Well, the rule of thumb says" then I could quit saying, "I don't have a rule of thumb house!" We'll be downsizing from a 3 ton unit to a 2 ton unit. Swapping 12 SEER AC for 19 SEER and being out of the 77% gas heat and into 10 HSPF electric heat, but I don't understand this number. I was told that if I used this particular unit {I'd given him the PN's from Maytag so he could look this and a 16 SEER unit up}, my HERS score would drop to 13, where if I replaced the unit with the 16 SEER model, my score would only drop to 15. We ordered the 19 SEER unit yesterday. I also have a page from the report that gives the house energy efficiency score, but I can't put my hands on a copy to post. It said 100 is the baseline for a typical house built to minimum code {in 2006, I think}, the average house in this country is ~ 130, to be Energy Star rated a house would need to be no more than 70, and my house scored 79. I think repairing duct leaks and the new HVAC would drop that number a noticeable amount. He also made a comment to me that the scores are based on typical usage patterns with 1 person in the house per bedroom, plus 1 more, so 4 people in our 3 BR house. Then he said he recognized that my wife and I are not typical. Sometimes it's nice to not be normal. Don't know what I did wrong posting the label. I wanted it to just show up, not a link. Last edited by Daox; 07-10-13 at 07:53 AM.. Reason: Don't know what I did wrong on the label? |
The Following User Says Thank You to gasstingy For This Useful Post: | Piwoslaw (07-11-13) |
07-10-13, 07:52 AM | #8 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
|
You can't post PDFs as images. You'd have to save them off as jpgs or something. I did this for ya.
__________________
Current project - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. & To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post: | gasstingy (07-10-13) |
07-10-13, 08:37 AM | #9 | |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
|
Quote:
HSPF is a number derived in a lab, assuming typical American climate (what is that?) and typical response of the heat pump to that climate. When the outside temperature is higher, air-source heat pumps are more efficient. When the outside temperature gets colder, air-source heat pumps become progressively less efficient. So, HSPF looks at the whole heating season and comes up with one average number. In Europe, heat pumps are rated in COP (Coefficient Of Performance), which I think would be a better number to use. COP means the 'energy input' divided by the 'energy output'. For instance, a typical car has a COP of about 0.15 or 15%. Pretty low. Your rig has a HSPF of 10, which can be converted to COP by dividing HSPF by 3.412 COP = HSPF/3.412 = 10/3.412 = 2.93 = 293% efficient. That's pretty good. If you want to compare how your heat pump compares to your old furnace, trot on over to Build It Solar, and check out their FUEL COMPARISON CALCULATOR. This will let you put in your own local electricity and gas costs, the efficiency of your old furnace, and now that you know your COP (293%), you can also put in the efficiency of your heat pump. You will be amazed. Best, -AC
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker... |
|
|
|