11-30-14, 10:04 PM | #31 | |
Less usage=Cheaper bills
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 940
Thanks: 41
Thanked 117 Times in 91 Posts
|
Quote:
44000*.8=35200 35200/(45*1.08)= 724 CFM You are getting 724CFM from 150 watts? Is this 825RPM motor a PSC motor? The reason I ask is I replaced my old shaded pole furnace motor with a PSC motor and I thought I was impressed by going from 804 watts down to 320 watts on the highest speed tap. I'm a little under 800CFM based on my own output capacity and temp rise. |
|
12-01-14, 05:16 AM | #32 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 267
Thanks: 108
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
Unit is a 90%, 39.6k output, 814CFM. Works out perfect for the 2 ton AC also. The 150W is a SINGLE SPEED 825RPM PSC condenser motor. 3 speed PSC motors have a lot of "winding waste" for the lower speeds that makes a big impact on efficiency.
The fun part is the motor is the 1/3HP 230V motor running on 120v. Couldn't find a 825 RPM 115v motor anyhwere, thought I'd try a 230v and modify the cap. The motor specs a 7.5UF cap, had to use a 10UF to get to to run properly on 115v. Tried a 12.5uf, but it increased amp draw without any change in speed. Motor is rated for 1.8A @ 230v, draws 1.2A @ 120v. Power tests were done with a Kill-a-watt. Blower wheel is 10x8, original motor 1/3HP 115v 4 speed. "3 ton drive" if you will. Ductwork is all flex, (2)12" returns with 20x20x4 filters. (2)10" plus (2)8" supply ducts off of the main 17"x20" plenum. Ductwork is a bit oversized for 800CFM, old system was 3 ton/88k @ 1200CFM. |
12-02-14, 08:44 AM | #33 |
Less usage=Cheaper bills
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 940
Thanks: 41
Thanked 117 Times in 91 Posts
|
I've considered trying a cap swap to a lower rating but never really had any experience doing this even though it isn't a difficult test. The spec cap is 7.5mfd but I think I have a 5mfd cap sitting around. I suppose I make the swap and watch the amp draw and make sure it can spin up properly and the temp rise is not adversely affected?
|
12-02-14, 09:38 AM | #34 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 267
Thanks: 108
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
Changing cap value will not always give good results. If you are running rated HP/amps/voltage the rated cap will normally give best results. I only changed the cap value because I'm running a 230v motor on a 120v circuit.
|
12-12-14, 08:20 AM | #35 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 314
Thanks: 39
Thanked 50 Times in 45 Posts
|
If you change your capacitor value check before and after motor amps to make sure you're not increasing your power usage.
So if longer furnace run times are more efficient then one easy improvement would be to set your thermostat program settings with more differential. This makes sense if you leave for work or if you have 2 hvac. We sleep upstairs so downstairs can be shutdown all night. After everyone leaves both units can set back 10 degrees. I also stagger my schedules so downstairs runs before upstairs to anticipate the heat rise and prevent overshooting the upstairs set point. "Losing" the heat to the upstairs also increases my run times. If your house is already tight and insulated there might not be much of a temperature drop before you return but you should get the extra temperature swing to take advantage of optimized heating temperature. |
12-25-14, 04:17 PM | #36 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 267
Thanks: 108
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
+1, always test and verify any modifications you do.
|
|
|