07-28-15, 07:20 PM | #11 |
Too Many Projects
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: georgia
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
I agree about the moving parts. The flat panel approach is probably best for an RV.
My next concern is weight. Five 100W panels at 40 pounds each is 200 pounds. Add three batteries, wire, charge control, inverter, and the panel support and I've got 500 pounds. Figure $1000 for everything and a generator looks cheap unless I went full time off grid. I bought a nice RV park membership so I wouldn't have to be off grid. I may abstain from solar until I've had some field experience. Nibs: Did you visit Quartzite, and if so, did you enjoy it? There seems to be a love/hate relationship among those who talk about it on the web. |
08-01-15, 03:41 PM | #12 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 206
Thanks: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
Yes went to Qsite several times, sometimes for 2 months at a stretch.
15 yrs full time, never bought into a campground scheme. A honda genset just big enough to run your AC when needed ( we do not have AC, even when travelling in Mexico. Start out with one 200 watt panel, ditch the batteries that came with the unit and install T105 golf cart batts, two or four will give you an amazing amount of storage. We figured that in a smallish 5th wheel we needed to replace about 500 watts per day, so a 200 watt panel comes very close. If the mods think this is too far off the eco theme you can pm me and I will give more tips. |
08-10-15, 04:06 AM | #13 |
Land owner
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NM
Posts: 1,026
Thanks: 12
Thanked 127 Times in 107 Posts
|
Over on the solar-electric forum no one recommends trackers even for stationary applications.
Then once you have solar panels on top of your camper, the only gigantic design flaw I see is you have to leave your camper in the sun all day for the panels to work. |
08-10-15, 07:11 AM | #14 |
Too Many Projects
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: georgia
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Not really a design flaw. The object of snowbirding is to park your camper in the sun all day, preferably in some desolate part of the southwest where they have sun all day.
|
08-10-15, 10:31 AM | #15 |
Apprentice EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 206
Thanks: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
In our Motor coach, we used to head south every Nov to the sunny desert, and north to the cool shady forest in the spring.
Now, with fuel at $4 +/- and using it at 8.5 mpg, it would cost us $1400 just for fuel. we leave the coach at home and take our car staying in a hotel in Mexico for much less impact on the wallet and environment. |
08-10-15, 07:50 PM | #16 |
DIY Geek
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 401
Thanks: 74
Thanked 83 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
08-11-15, 02:48 PM | #17 |
Too Many Projects
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: georgia
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
I noticed the weight discrepancy as soon as I looked at bigger panels. 40 pounds for 100W was probably shipping weight. Now if only the same were true for the batteries.
|
08-12-15, 11:28 AM | #18 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: a field somewhere
Posts: 304
Thanks: 64
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
|
higher voltage panels are better. cheaper per watt. easier to install.
lose the lead acid battery. lithium batteries are far superior. available today. longer life span. 1/3 the weight. look for lifepo4. lithium ferrous phosphate. esp. off grid or RV. the performance benefits are numerous. |
08-12-15, 04:50 PM | #19 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Delhi, NY
Posts: 332
Thanks: 20
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
|
Trackers aren't worth it anymore.
I go along with the gang.
When I built my racks I had the crazy idea of building trackers, never again, and I have some pretty sophisticated equipment here from electronics to machining. Bottom line, I wound up making the racks stationary and adding a couple of panels. lighter, less to go wrong and cheaper. My last modules cost me less than a buck a watt. I think, if you can afford them, the Lipo batts will save you weight and space. I'm moving away from L/A batts now. After ten years of using them in my system (eight Rolls 530S's) I'm ready for less maintenance and a battery to simply take up the slack when the grid fails. The rest of the time I'm happy to feed the grid and have a negative electric bill. One more thing, if I was doing an RV I'd look into flexible modules, there's something about dragging along rigid modules while going 70 mph that makes me uncomfortable! Rob |
08-12-15, 07:11 PM | #20 |
Journeyman EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: a field somewhere
Posts: 304
Thanks: 64
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
|
rob I'm just a bit north of you. I put my 1kw panel set on dock hinges. I get a good bit of extra power, nice on the cloudy days, by going 30 degrees for summer, 45 spring/fall, but the biggest thing is going 60 in the winter. I actually go a bit past 60. Makes the panels easier to clean/sweep the snow off of. which, needless to say, greatly improves power gathering capacity.
I put up a second kw for .80 used, third hand. Those I just leave at the winter angle. don't really need them in the summer. but come the fall/winter ... well you know. the new lifepo4s. it's insane. 20 year lifespan (7000 discharge cycles) at 50% dod now. I mean I can trade in my 720 lbs of lead acid for 250 lbs of lfp and get twice the usable power. me like. (and the point here is that lifepo4 is 1/3 the weight for rvers.) so hey. okay almost twice the cost. but 3-4 times the lifespan. me also like. and no maintenance. yup still liking. now if they would invent a battery that could work without problem at -20. Ah well. can't have everything. |
|
|