![]() |
|
Advanced Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | ||||
Infrequent noob
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 1000 Islands region, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 402
Thanks: 37
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]() I just read an article about a competition called the "Zerofootprint Re-Skinning Awards"
The Zerofootprint Prize Quote:
EG: ![]() 60 year old wartime house in Toronto, Ontario. Originally built with minimal insulation, single pane glass, etc. Since winning the re-skin it award in 2010, the house... Quote:
Speaking of a re-skinning/conversion of an old car dealership, the architect says: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
.
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post: | AC_Hacker (03-23-12) |
![]() |
#2 | |
Helper EcoRenovator
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 91
Thanks: 6
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Sheesh. The government isn't some entity which has its own money, the government's money is my money, my neighbor's money, and so on. When the government takes our money away from us to give it to other home owners, that means that we've got less of the money we worked for to spend on ourselves and our families. What I'd suggest this guy do is a test to see how popular his scheme is. He should make an announcement that he is collecting money for this program and that people will receive the proceeds of the loan repayments which arise from the money that they invest. If people think that this is a better use for their money than what they had intended to spend it on, then that speaks to the merit of his idea. If, however, he doesn't get many takers, then that loudly and clearly declares that people think that they have better uses for the money that they've earned than directing it to this scheme. Injecting government stealing money from people and playing Robin Hood doesn't change the fundamental dynamics here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Helper EcoRenovator
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada!
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]() Well if 40% of the regions housing can be made to use 70% less energy then the regions energy systems will see relief. Maybe the local utility could provide the loan to save their assets.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Master EcoRenovator
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver Island BC
Posts: 745
Thanks: 23
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]() I think they wanted to do the tax benefit for large buildings not individual homes. There is zero incentive for landlords to do anything with their rental units up here. The availability situation in many towns is so bad people will stay in mold infested hellholes with holes in the roof for years simply because there is no where else for them to go.
Convincing a landlord to spend tens if not hundreds of thousands on an apartment building so that his clients can have lower costs on their bills is never going to happen. I'm not saying it's a good idea I'm just saying that is probably why they are considering the tax benefit route. Since I am considering moving somewhere colder and into a 100+ year old farmhouse I really wish they gave more information about what they do to seal the outside up. How they deal with windows no longer being flush to the outside and so on. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||
Helper EcoRenovator
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 91
Thanks: 6
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
For a conventional residential tenancy rent increase in British Columbia that takes effect in 2012, the allowable increase is 4.3 per cent.There is zero incentive because the government prohibits the landlords from benefiting from such improvements. If there is a near zero rental availability rate then that is a pretty strong signal that the rents being charged are below the market clearing rate. If landlords had the ability to price to market then there would be incentive to improve units for they would be able to recoup via rent what they invest in their housing stock. Quote:
With government controlling how much rent increase a landlord can charge, with government controlling eviction processes to make it damn difficult to evict a bad tenant, etc, being a landlord is not as attractive an investment strategy as it used to be, hence people deciding to invest their money elsewhere, thus drying up the rental market and causing shortages. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Master EcoRenovator
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver Island BC
Posts: 745
Thanks: 23
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]() I fully agree although I am a supporter of leaving that farmland farmland. If a city can't feed itself it shouldn't exist.
Let the costs keep climbing, if you can't afford to live there then don't. Nothing says Vancouver is some magical place that everyone has to work and live in. In many cases you can make the same wage for doing the same job in Vancouver as you would elsewhere but you get the insane price of living to be there. I actually don't live in vancouver, I'm on the island at the moment. The same crap you're discussing is happening here just were still 1/3 the cost of the mainland. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
Helper EcoRenovator
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 91
Thanks: 6
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Secondly, by taking this land out of the market, the cost of land that can be developed sky rockets. This makes housing costs go up. There have been studies which detailed all the costs associated with zoning and they've tallied up to about 40-50% of the cost of a house in some cities. I just find it ironic whenever I see instances of people saying "government should fix the problem" when in fact it was government that caused the problem by interfering in people's rational decision making. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 724 Times in 534 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for posting this very interesting article. This is exactly the approach I am taking to my house. It is heartening to see that the same approach is being applied elsewhere. Deep energy retrofits are not easy and not cheap but in my opinion they are well worthwhile. My advice to a home owner who wants to retrofit an old house is to divide the big task into many small target tasks and work on them when the time, gumption and financial resources are available, and relax when they aren't. It gives me a secret pride that I am giving new life to a piece of history. I know that the ghosts that live here with me are pleased! -AC_Hacker
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Lurking Renovator
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
While I don't think communism is productive, I also think just about every "ism" is completely idiotic because life isn't binary or static. Some principles of every "ism" make sense when correctly applied. So if you're going to raise the rent in Vancouver, be prepared to deal with the sequelae of that decision - either a lot less service or a lot more traffic and pollution as your servicemen/women have to commute from wherever they can afford to live to wherever the jobs are. This is what happens when your economy is a lie. High prices on booze means more trade in illicit drugs because we have yet to face the reality that it is completely normal and endemic to humanity to use perception-altering substances. But dealers of legal drugs can settle business disputes in court, and are held accountable for their business practices. Dealers of substances deemed illegal have no such means of settling disputes and must do so with violence. They also have no incentive to play fair or restrict their sales to adults... I for one prefer to see drug dealers operate above the law, since they're going to operate no matter what the law is anyway. Last edited by shovel; 03-12-13 at 01:27 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|