![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 964
Thanks: 189
Thanked 111 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]() I've had flywheel energy storage in my head ever since I read in a PopSci issue (somewhere in 1995-1999) about plans to use flywheels buried next to houses for backup energy when the grid goes down, or to relieve grid load. I've been waiting for this to happen and... nothing
![]() So today I searched around and found this great blog: Damn Interesting - The Mechanical Battery. The comments are actually the best part. I'm still going through them, but thought I'd go ahead and share my find now. Here's more info: One megawatt of grid storage, 10 big flywheels. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,525
Thanks: 1,162
Thanked 374 Times in 305 Posts
|
![]() Yeah, flywheels are definitely a means of energy storage. I wonder how price compares to other forms of energy storage though.
__________________
Current project - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. & To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 14
Thanked 257 Times in 241 Posts
|
![]() For large amounts of fixed energy storage, wouldn't pumped water be cheaper?
__________________
To my surprise, shortly after Naomi Wu gave me a bit of fame for making good use of solar power, Allie Moore got really jealous of her... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 964
Thanks: 189
Thanked 111 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
[EDIT: I found that pumping water to a higher reservoir and then turning it into electricity again has an efficiency of about 70%.] I think flywheels are still in the expensive zone, mostly because of the carbon fiber they are made of (that is going down) and reinforcements to the outer shell. I would think, though, that putting one in a concrete box under your lawn, with the spin axis vertical, and adding something (either mechanical or electronic) to keep the rpm's at least 10% below the safe max should be OK. I wonder how big a 5kW flywheel would be, or a 25kW. If you wanted to buy large amounts of cheap electricity at night and sell it back during the day, then how long would it pay back? Last edited by Piwoslaw; 12-30-09 at 10:19 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lurking Renovator
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Flywheel "batteries" have high power density but low energy density. Said another way... they can deliver large amounts of power for very short periods but are lousy for delivering small/medium amounts of power for a long time. It's better to think of them like capacitors than batteries. They cover or absorb spikes but do not last long.
Only very specialized flywheels have anything approaching battery performance over long time periods. They are made out of carbon fiber and spun in hard vacuum over magnetic bearings. It isn't something a DIY'r could rig up in his basement. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Supreme EcoRenovator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 14
Thanked 257 Times in 241 Posts
|
![]() If I remember correctly, those air wrenches work by spinning a tiny flywheel and using a centrifugal clutch to connect it to the chuck.
__________________
To my surprise, shortly after Naomi Wu gave me a bit of fame for making good use of solar power, Allie Moore got really jealous of her... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Lurking Renovator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It looks like it's somewhere in the range of 76K cubic inches in a very narrow column. Not too big for a home installation. It does cost $80K US so is still kind of pricey for an average income. I also agree that using a reinforced concrete poured structure buried with a vertical axis should allow some of the flywheels housing reinforcement to be reduced. The purpose of the heavy housing is to prevent a catastrophic failure from exploding. A buried installation would also prevent this as the earth and concrete would absorb the energy. That would just leave a vessel strong enough to withstand a vacuum. Magnetic bearings and evacuated operation are important to avoid energy losses to friction and with something heavy moving at high RPMs friction loss adds up very quickly. As to your last point I'm not sure that's even possible without very specific licenses and prior approval from the utility company, but as a thought experiment: If you bought one of these and were able to exploit the difference in day/night costs of about $0.04/KWhr for the entire 300Kwhr then you'd be getting $12/day and it would take 18 years for ROI. If you could find a higher day/night difference it would reduce the ROI. That is about the same as ROI on a solar installation so it would probably be better to just invest in a large solar installation as less complex and having less legal issues. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 964
Thanks: 189
Thanked 111 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]() So I came accross this article in PV Magazine, about a French start-up 'Energiestro' working on residential scale flywheel systems.
I checked out their webpage, but no updates since 2021 ![]() Maybe EU funding dried up before they completed R&D?
__________________
Ecorenovation - the bottomless piggy bank that tries to tame the energy hog. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|