View Single Post
Old 01-02-15, 10:09 AM   #19
redneck
Helper EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Posts: 57
Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
No, they are huge an a single cloud doesn't block the whole thing, and where they are located has a lot of sun, most of the time. We can use molten salt thermal storage to extend the time they can generate power. Combined with wind power and solar PV, and biomass, and wave power, and tidal, and geothermal - we can easily generate more than enough electricity.

Nuclear power is a terrible idea. We still do not have a way to safely store the waste.

No safe storage. After 60+ years.

They shut down for weeks every 18 months or so, to refuel -- and we have to mine and refine and transport and enrich the uranium - and then we have to pay money for decades after they shut down to decommission them. We have a limited uranium supply, and making concrete is a very big greenhouse gas emitter.

They have problems when the temperatures around the plant get too high, and the cooling doesn't work well enough. They have power issues in the plant itself, and flooding or earthquakes or other disasters cause them to have to be shut down. Pilgrim here in Massachusetts has had numerous problems.

No thanks.
This would address most of those concerns. It also addresses problems with other ways of producing electrical power (wind, solar, etc).




>

Last edited by Daox; 01-02-15 at 12:33 PM..
redneck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redneck For This Useful Post:
jeff5may (01-02-15), StevefromBigSky (05-24-16)