View Single Post
Old 06-10-15, 08:46 AM   #127
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MEMPHIS91 View Post
I got a chance to make a quick test tonight here are the numbers.

Time in Minutes Water Temp F Watts Borehole F COP
0 85 0 55.5
30 89.5 0.17 52.5 3.22
60 93.7 0.36 53.6 2.69
90 97.7 0.55 54.5 2.57

I will finish out the test soon and see if I might still need to trim just a hair off the cap tube. And then it will just be playing with the charge.
I thought you'd be interested to see what a graphic representation of your data looks like:



Y = temp, X = time



Y = COP, X = temp

Looking at your Temp vs. Time plot, it is very linear, with no down-turn in the range of data. This tells me that your system is not approaching any limit. This is a very good thing, to be operating within a linear range. It also indicates that it would be quite possible to reach higher temperatures, but the second graph indicates the COP-reduction penalty you would pay.

Awesome work from everybody involved!


Best,

-AC

P.S.: If you separate your horizontal data with tabs, it make it much easier to plot.
Attached Images
  
__________________
I'm not an HVAC technician. In fact, I'm barely even a hacker...
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AC_Hacker For This Useful Post:
Daox (06-10-15)