View Single Post
Old 04-08-13, 01:09 PM   #16
TimJFowler
Apprentice EcoRenovator
 
TimJFowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 184
Thanks: 9
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevehull View Post
You are right about the therm reduction (60.8 to 51.0 =-16.12). However the reduction of degree days is 1029 to 911 = -11.47.

So , despite a decrease in the heating load of ~ 11.5%, there was a reduction in gas usage of 16%.

Maybe that difference was where the 5% reduction came from . . . .

Steve
I want to provide some clarification on my measured 5% decrease in Natural Gas usage.

I compared natural gas use for the same billing period (Jan / Feb.) bill for the year before and after I installed the programmable thermostat. I then pulled the Heating Degree Day data (from wunderground.com) for the same days as the billing period for each year. Then I divided the Therms of Natural Gas used by Heating Degree Days (Therms / H.D.D.) to compare the difference the programmable thermostat made.

Therms of Natural Gas used per Heating Degree Day was the point of comparison that showed the 5% reduction in Natural Gas used. There is probably a more accurate way to calculate the difference, but not with the tools that I have.

I hope that helps,
Tim
__________________
- DIY Adventures in Applied Sustainability -

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
TimJFowler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TimJFowler For This Useful Post:
Daox (04-08-13)