View Single Post
Old 04-29-11, 01:40 AM   #35
Piwoslaw
Super Moderator
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 961
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
56°N... that's awfully close to the arctic circle. It has to be tough to be passive when the sun is 10° above the horizon at noon on the solstice.
The angle at which the sun's rays hit the window is much closer to perpendicular. But yes, the sun is above the horizon for no more than 6-7 hours, plus the rays of sunlight have to travel through a thicker layer of atmosphere. Here in Warsaw (52°N) the amount of energy from the sun in the winter is 4 times less than in the summer (~350 W/m2 vs ~1300 W/m2). I believe that passivhaus design for locations close to the polar circle is geared towards thermal mass, to hold as much of summer's/autumn's heat for as long as possible, and towards using heat produced by the inhabitants, cooking, and waste heat from electronics. "Don't unplug that wall wart or we'll freeze!"
__________________
Ecorenovation - the bottomless piggy bank that tries to tame the energy hog.
Piwoslaw is offline   Reply With Quote