View Single Post
Old 01-30-15, 03:37 PM   #2
mackstann
Lurking Renovator
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Damn. I realized that the per-kWh number I was using for standard billing was too high. Re-running the corrected number turned the equation around and it looks like I'd pay more (~$70 more during the ~6 month time span). I'd have to shift a significant amount of use to off-peak times in order to benefit, and trying to estimate how much I could do that is very speculative.
mackstann is offline   Reply With Quote