View Single Post
Old 03-01-12, 12:55 PM   #18
Piwoslaw
Super Moderator
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 961
Thanks: 188
Thanked 110 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Results are in from the last 4 weeks. Last winter the test was also 4 weeks, but with the timer being taken off or on for 1 week at a time. This year I did it for 2 weeks at a time (because I forgot after the first week).
  • Weeks 1-2: 8.097 kWh over 334.2h (timer turns fridge off 0-6am)
  • Weeks 3-4: 8.429 kWh over 333.5h (no timer)
Recalculating that, and adding the min/max temps inside the fridge and in the kitchen:
  • Timer: 581.5 Wh per 24h, temps: 2.6°/6.7°C and 17.2°/20.9°C
  • No timer: 606.5 Wh per 24h, temps: 2.3°/4.4°C and 16.1°/19.4°C

Comparing to last year's test:
  1. Turning the refrigerator off for 6 hours at night gave the same 4-5% savings.
  2. The energy usage is slightly higher than last year, even though I insuated the back of the fridge. This may be because:
    • Judging by the min and max temps, the temperature inside the fridge was ~1°C lower, but the kitchen temperature was higher than last year.
    • The Wife was home this whole month, so there was more cooking and fridge-opening happening.
    • The fridge is a year older... Not sure how much of a difference this makes for the refrigerator's workings, but it's definately making more noises (hisses, crackling, etc.).

I'll try to continue this test for another 2-4 weeks.
__________________
Ecorenovation - the bottomless piggy bank that tries to tame the energy hog.
Piwoslaw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
Daox (03-01-12)