View Single Post
Old 08-25-10, 01:20 PM   #14
AC_Hacker
Supreme EcoRenovator
 
AC_Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,004
Thanks: 303
Thanked 723 Times in 534 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
I heard somewhere that the opposite is true, but that may depend on quite a few parameters. But if what we want is more heat than power then a "less efficient" engine would be just the thing, right?
Well, possibly so, but consider that electricity is considered a 'higher quality' energy than heat, since it is easy to get nearly 100% efficiency when converting from electricity to heat, but it is very difficult to get much past 85% to 90% efficiency when converting from heat to electricity, 15% to 30% being common.

But you are right in that the 'wasted' heat energy would mostly be utilized.

However, if the inefficiency is due to fuel that is not totally combusted, it's a different matter.

-AC_Hacker

Last edited by AC_Hacker; 08-26-10 at 10:09 PM..
AC_Hacker is offline   Reply With Quote