View Single Post
Old 07-03-16, 07:03 PM   #12
DEnd
Apprentice EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 117
Thanks: 6
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiv View Post
Thank you DEnd,
I will look into Passivhaus.

Still, we do need to heat our houses for 3~4 months and I cannot think of a nicer feeling than to walk barefoot on warm floors.....

Natural gas is very cheap in WA, perhaps hydronics and gas heating is the cheapest answer.
The issue with hydronic floors is that for a tight house insulated well the needed floor temps are not actually toasty. To get the floors toasty warm you end up overheating the house. At the needed floor temps you can get very similar temperatures just by providing air space under the floor.

The least cost option is likely using a point source of heat/cooling. This becomes possible with high insulation levels, and high levels of air sealing. Point source options (like ductless mini-split heads) can however have distribution issues. There is a Net Zero builder up in Maine that uses a single ductless mini-split head on each floor of his houses. (http://transformations-inc.com/press...ards-Issue.pdf) One issue is that to keep interior temperatures consistent across rooms doors need to remain open. Another issue with a point source is that you don't tend to have very good air mixing, which can lead to pollutant build up in one area.

Energy use wise a heat pump has to get a Coefficient Of Performance above 3 to use less energy than natural gas. Even mini-splits typically only get this COP in mild temperatures. Of course if you get a really tight house insulated well then you may not even be able to find a Furnace with a low enough output. Also quite a large percent of a mini-splits energy can easily be offset with photovoltaic panels. With on site production and storage a mini-split only needs to get its COP slightly below 1 to use less energy than natural gas. Grid Tied PV offsetting mini-split energy useage raises the needed COP to about 1.5 - 2 or so.

If you take a look at environmental sustainability a heat pump wins in most cases. A furnace will never see CO2 and other emissions reductions, a heat pump, for most parts of the world, will always see a reduction in its emissions over its lifetime. This is because the electric grid is being pushed by market forces to be more efficient. Also you can easily add emissions reductions by adding PV to the system.
DEnd is offline   Reply With Quote