Quote:
Originally Posted by Xringer
Saying that "Global Warming is not a political subject" and also saying it's
"Settled Science" and there can be no debate about it.?.
That kinda makes it a taboo subject that can't be discussed.?. At all.?.
Well, I just want to make one last comment before I unsubscribe from this thread..
If it's really "Settled Science", and we have all the facts nailed down solid..
Can we now stop spending so much taxpayer's money on GW 'studies'??
Can we divert that money to a program that might divert asteroids from impacting the earth??
œ•Т•ž*˜Т Ч•›Я‘˜НСš - YouTube
Since that's a danger that even us non-asteroid-scientist can understand. |
We already do. With the said, the likely costs of anthropomorphic climate change are viewed as greater than the costs of an asteroid impact by most.
We can probably divert an asteroid in years to decades, but minimizing the impacts of and coping with the changes associated with climate change will take decades to centuries.