View Single Post
Old 02-28-16, 09:52 AM   #549
buffalobillpatrick
Master EcoRenovator
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florissant, Colorado
Posts: 599
Thanks: 814
Thanked 59 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobile Master Tech View Post
Energy Star's have a 67% or greater energy factor, which is probably about an 80% efficient burner.
Gas hot water heaters loose convective heat up the stack constantly and are not nearly as efficient as advertised.


Heating requirements at high altitude in Colorado are MUCH different than Southern states.

My Son's house is in Crested Butte Colorado at 8,888' altitude, climate zone 6, as is much of Alaska (read too damn cold).

IBC 2009 states that the heating system has to be able to keep every room at 70* at design temperature (-20*F)

It was designed & specified by a great architect who used REScheck to calculate the UA = 1,194

The Design Delta between 70* -> -20* = 90*

The output of the boiler must be at least: 1,194 x 90 = 107,460 btus/hr

I decided on a Burnham ESC6NI-TH (high altitude version) Sealed combustion via side wall.
Efficiency=85.2%, DOE=130,000, IBR=113,000

A proven design cast iron boiler like this costs about 1/2 of a good ModCon boiler.
But it is way more reliable, will probably last 30-40 years, & requires MUCH less maintenance.

This is why plumbing/heating shops love ModCons, they weigh a lot less & there is way more profit $$

A large boiler needs a large buffer tank to prevent short cycling, especially if only 1 zone is calling for heat & it's 50* outside.

Last edited by buffalobillpatrick; 02-28-16 at 10:48 AM..
buffalobillpatrick is offline   Reply With Quote