View Single Post
Old 03-24-13, 03:05 PM   #9
MN Renovator
Less usage=Cheaper bills
 
MN Renovator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 939
Thanks: 41
Thanked 116 Times in 90 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikesolar View Post
It seems to me that the screen only sees maybe 40%-50% of the sunlight available to it so I can't see how it would be as efficient as a solid flat body. It is all about (1)surface area, (2)absorption and (3)emission.
You use three layers. When Gary built it, I think three layers of fiberglass screen has the screen taking 79% of the sunlight. The rest hits the back of the collector and isn't lost if the back of the collector is rigid foam.
MN Renovator is offline   Reply With Quote