Fiberglass R-value loss in cold weather - R-value drop quantified
I just wanted to discuss this and get some info floating around here on it. It has been mentioned a number of times here that fiberglass looses its r-value in cold weather.
Today, I found this article that actually quantifies the extreme loss of r-value as temperature drops. This article shows that fiberglass will loose up to 50% of its r-value if the temperature differential is high enough! In contrast, it shows cellulose actually raises in r-value as the temperature differential increases. FOAM-TECH: Building Envelope Theory - R-Value Drift Through my reading, I have heard this is mainly from air convection through the insulation. The cold air drops and warm air rises right through the insulation itself. Cellulose is apparently much better at blocking air flow through itself than fiberglass. So, I'm sure closed cell foam would be even better. Here is another article that goes into detail a bit more. Convective Loss in Loose-Fill Attic Insulation The one thing that these articles don't address is batt insulation. Each article specifically addresses the fiberglass as loose fill fiberglass. Are the same problems there with batt insulation? |
Quote:
Is cold air a better insulator than warm air? (Because of air density...) |
I would imagine warm air would be better because of density. There will be less conduction of heat if the molecules (of whatever) are farther apart. This would make your evacuated containers the best thing available.
|
I would imagine that the same effects would occur, because even with foil faced, there still is a gap at every edge for air movement. I have read that putting cellulose over the top of fiberglass insulation prevents this problem
|
Insulation Tests & Reflections...
Quote:
I placed insulation in question below, and beside the sample. The test was conducted in my living room, so the temp was always the same. I would place the sample into the test rig, put a thermocouple in the water, place insulation over the sample, put on a lid with holes (there were also holes in the bottom of the bucket) and take data at regular intervals, for an hour. I had no way to quantify the materials, but I could get a ranking of materials when I plotted the heat loss data. The ranking agreed with the study you cite. Cellulose = best Fiberglass = middle Styrofoam peanuts = worst (recycling maniac = me) However, when I mixed small-particle styrofoam chunks in with the peanuts to fill the voids, it ranked with cellulose. So yes, air migration was the villian. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& There's also an R-value creep regarding polyurethane foam, if compared to expanded poly-styrene. Funny, the study didn't mention that in the study. Possibly it's because they (Foam-Tech) sell the polyurethane foam. The polyurethane foam has a higher initial R-value (and cost) but over time (15 years or so) it's R-value falls, because it takes up moisture, to about the R-value level of EPS (expanded poly-styrene). So initially, polyurethane foam is the R-value winner, but over time, EPS becomes the 'R-value per dollar' winner. Best Regards, -AC_Hacker %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
Do you have a link to the study done on that?
|
Quote:
However...
I hope this helps... Best Regards, -AC_Hacker %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
Interesting, but a bit contradictory. Your third link says that foil faced polyiso is 22 times better at blocking moisture than XPS.
I'll have to do some more digging. I'm sure there are problems, but getting data that says polyiso from the extruded polystyrene foam association doesn't seem like the most unbiased source, haha. They did source an Oak Ridge National Lab study, but we have no way of knowing the conditions of that test. Thanks AC Hacker. |
The ranking agreed with the study you cite.
Cellulose = best Fiberglass = middle Styrofoam peanuts = worst (recycling maniac = me) However, when I mixed small-particle styrofoam chunks in with the peanuts to fill the voids, it ranked with cellulose. So yes, air migration was the villian. [ Hi There, im brand new to the forum and am happy i found. I found this little bit very ienteresting, as I can get laods of styrofoam particles (from a styro board cutter) and was thinking of using it as garage insulation. I was wary, not having any information as to how effective it would be. You tested a mix of peanuts with particles. did you ever test just the styrofoam particles alone? Pierre |
Energy Savers: Polystyrene Insulation Materials
this link from EPA states loose fill styro has an r-value of 2.3 per inch. isnt that quite a bit lower than cellulose? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger